Skip to content Skip to footer

Exploring the Role and Ethical Considerations of ChatGPT and Other LLMs in Higher Education

Introduction

Integrating advanced language models such as ChatGPT, Google Bard, and other large language models (LLMs) into university education signifies a pivotal shift in pedagogical strategies and resource allocation. These technologies offer a wealth of benefits, including personalized learning and enhanced access to information. However, their adoption is not without ethical quandaries, particularly concerning data privacy, accuracy of content, and potential misuse. Research by Tuhuteru et al. (2023), Rukman et al. (2023), and Harahap, Suherlan, et al. (2023) highlight the utility of these AI tools in educational settings while cautioning against the risks of overlooking their limitations and ethical implications. This article delves into the multifaceted impact of LLMs like ChatGPT on higher education, examining their potential as learning aids against the backdrop of ethical concerns, thereby guiding a balanced and responsible approach to this new era in education.

The Potential of ChatGPT in Higher Education

Studies, such as those conducted by Tuhuteru et al. (2023), Rukman et al. (2023), have highlighted the transformative role ChatGPT can play in the classroom. It can assist in providing high-quality reading materials and creating customized tests (Kasneci et al., 2023; Cooper, 2023), thereby supplementing teachers’ efforts in designing effective lesson plans and making the teaching process more efficient. With the ability to understand natural language and generate text, ChatGPT can create differentiated questions and tests that match the students’ level of understanding (Cooper, 2023). This will make it easier for teachers to create relevant questions and tests and save time.

It can be used to enhance student-teacher interactions (Hong, 2023) as well as improving students’ communication skills and quality of their writing (Marzuki et al., 2022). By summarizing complex academic texts, ChatGPT helps students understand and engage with difficult texts (Adeshola, 2023). In remote settings in post-pandemic education, this can expose students to diverse information, spark creativity, create a dynamic, interactive learning environment, and maintain continuity of learning. In overall, ChatGPT enriches the overall student learning experience and positively.

However, as Haleem et al. (2022) noted, ChatGPT cannot replace human teachers’ nuanced guidance and mentorship.

Ethical Considerations and Challenges

A significant concern is the ethical use of ChatGPT, particularly regarding data privacy and security. There’s also the issue of accuracy and potential misuse, such as spreading disinformation or plagiarism ( Ausat, 2022). These challenges necessitate robust institutional policies and student education on ethical AI use. The limited quality of the ChatGPT’s feedback potentially leads to inaccurate and biased information (Zhu, et., al., 2023). It can decreases the students’ creativity. Furthermore, it possibly exposes students’ ethical issues and declines their analytical and critical skills development. The use of Chat GPT in ELT may interfere successful educational process through preventing the development of students’ analytical and critical skills (Stepanechko & Kozub, 2023). Additionally, it brings integrity issues. Chat GPT obviously presents challenge to integrity because sometimes students tend to rely on Chat GPT answers to complete their homework instead of using it as a reference only (Waltzer, Cox, & Heyman, 2023). At last, it possibly involves plagiarism. The urge to find instant solution without giving bigger effort may expose the students to plagiarism issue as it is simple to copy paste the answer then paraphrase it (Eke, 2023). There is a study that surveyed 220 people vial online questionnaire to learn more about their experiences with motivations for using AI-powered conversational agents. This research looks at how AI systems and chatbots can supplement human knowledge and judgment, as well as their potential drawbacks. The results showed that participants thought Chat GPT integration was moderately accessible and had moderately positive social attitudes. They understood the value and responsibility of Chat GPT in creating individualized educational opportunities. Participants stressed the necessity for explicit institutional standards regarding privacy and data security. Gender, age, sense of accessibility, social attitude, opinions, and personal experience, privacy and data security, institutional guidelines, and individualized learning were also found to affect participants’ reliance on AI through regression analysis.

Addressing Misuse and Promoting Responsible Use

  1. Preventing Plagiarism: To maintain academic integrity, it is important to encourage original thinking and use efficient plagiarism detection tools.. The use of AI tools helps maintain academic integrity.
  2. Quality Control: Educators should guide students in verifying information provided by AI, promoting critical thinking and independent research skills.
  3. Policy Development: Clear guidelines on using AI tools like ChatGPT are essential. These policies should cover data privacy, intellectual property, and consequences of misuse.
  4. Educator and Student Training: Both educators and students need training on the ethical use of AI. This includes understanding its limitations and focusing on developing problem-solving skills.
  5. Collaboration with Developers: Institutions could work with AI developers to create education-specific AI tools that minimize misuse risks, such as custom filters for academic integrity.

Conclusion

The integration of ChatGPT and similar AI tools in higher education presents both opportunities and challenges. While they can significantly aid the learning process, it is crucial to address ethical considerations, data privacy concerns, and the potential for misuse. By developing comprehensive policies, conducting regular training for educators and students, and fostering a culture of responsible AI use, higher education institutions can harness the benefits of AI while maintaining academic integrity and promoting critical thinking skills.References:Rukman, W. Y., Urath, S., Harini, H., Ausat, A. M. A., & Suherlan, S. (2023). Philosophy Education as a Means of Developing Student Soft Skills. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(1), 281–286.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v7i1.5458Tuhuteru, L., Ausat, A. M. A., Pratiwi, E. Y. R., & Suherlan, S. (2023). The Role of Civic Education in Promoting Diversity and Tolerance in Schools. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(1), 275–280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v7i1.5456Harahap, M. A. K., Suherlan, S., Rijal, S., & Ausat, A. M. A. (2023). Defining the Business Philosophy Foundation for Sustainable Business Education. Journal on Education, 5(4), 15776–15783. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2690Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274Cooper, G. (2023). Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-yHaleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004Ausat, A. M. A. (2022). Positive Impact of The Covid-19 Pandemic on The World of Education.Jurnal Pendidikan, 23(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.33830/JP.V23I2.3048.2022Eke, D, O. (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? Journal of Responsible Technology,13, 1-4.Hong, W. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on foreign language teaching and learning: Opportunities in education and research. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 5(10), 37-45.Marzuki, et al. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 1-17, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469Zhu, I., C., et., al. (2023). How to harness the potential of Chat GPT in education? . Knowledge Management & E-learning Journal, 15(2), 133–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.008Stepanechko, O., & Kozub, L. (2023). English teachers’ concerns about the ethical use of chatgpt by university students. International Scientific Journal, 297-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.Waltzer, T., Cox, R, L., & Heyman, G, D. (2023). Testing the ability of teachers and students to differentiate between essays generated by Chat GPT and high school students. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. 2023, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1923981Adeshola, Ibrahim, and Adeola Praise Adepoju. “The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education.” Interactive Learning Environments (2023): 1-14.

Leave a comment